Page 128 - Cyber Defense eMagazine July 2024
P. 128

Shifting perceptions of cybersecurity from cost burden to strategic enabler

            Traditionally,  the  CFO has perceived  the CIO as a cost centre  rather than a revenue  generator.  CIOs
            often  have  substantial  technology  budgets  that  can  be  seen  as  a  drain  on  resources  that  could  be
            allocated  elsewhere.  Consequently,  CFOs  have  often  been  sceptical  when  CIOs  request  additional
            technology  investments,  especially  when  previous  investments  might  not  have  fully  resolved  the
            problems they were meant to address.

            The  crux  of  the  issue  lies  in  the  lack  of  effective  communication  between  the  two  roles.  CIOs  have
            struggled to articulate the business case for investing in IT security infrastructure in terms that resonate
            with their financial counterparts.  In the face of declining or stagnant budgets, it is more critical than ever
            for  CIOs  to  clearly  communicate  the  value  and  necessity  of  their  technology  investments  to  secure
            support of the CFO and the board.

            Conversely,  CFOs  have  historically  viewed  cybersecurity  as  an  operational  concern  rather  than  a
            strategic imperative. They may not fully comprehend  how vulnerabilities  in the company's digital assets
            could lead to financial losses, intellectual  property theft, or erosion  of customer trust. There is often an
            underlying assumption that "it won't happen to us" until a breach occurs.

            However, this perception is evolving. There is a growing recognition that digital security is an enabler and
            an investment that delivers genuine business value, even if its benefits are not immediately apparent on
            a daily basis.

            In the wake  of a cyberattack,  not only is there  a significant  cost associated  with investing  in recovery
            technology,  but there is also the potential impact on the brand to consider,  which ultimately affects the
            overall financial control of the organisation.

            To mitigate these risks, the CIO should be responsible for developing and executing a comprehensive IT
            strategy  that  encompasses  both  defensive  measures,  such  as cybersecurity,  and  revenue-generating
            areas, including the company's website and e-commerce platforms. Although the CISO may have a direct
            line to the board, they will typically report to the CIO on a daily basis to ensure seamless  coordination
            and implementation of the organisation's  technology initiatives.

            The  more a  company  invests  in the  CIO  upfront,  the less  the financial  impact  will be  in the long  run.
            Automation  is a significant  driver of improved efficiencies;  removing  manual processes  helps increase
            engagement across teams using shared digital platforms rather than manual spreadsheets and data. The
            more automation the CIO can apply, the more effective they will be, and from the CFO's perspective, the
            more the business can get out of every single individual.


            Investing in the CIO saves money in the long term – while there may be an upfront cost, this is greatly
            outweighed by the savings over time.












            Cyber Defense eMagazine – July 2024 Edition                                                                                                                                                                                                          128
            Copyright © 2024, Cyber Defense Magazine. All rights reserved worldwide.
   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133