Page 177 - Cyber Defense eMagazine December 2022 Edition
P. 177

organizational agility, faster go-to-market product cycles, better cost-effectiveness, and greater talent and
            resource management.  To further elaborate:

               •  Agility:  The speed of technology evolution dictates organizations to be more agile.  Yesterday's
                   tech  stack  may  already  be  outdated  today.      The  elegance  of  low-code  is  its  modularity.
                   Independent  components  create  a  plug  and  play  environment  within  an  application  flow.
                   Therefore, an organization can make small changes rapidly, literally iterating to the market.
               •  GTM:    Low-code  componentizes  blocks  of  code,  allowing  their  reusability,  which  improves
                   development  times  compared  to  traditional  coding  methods.    Rapid  assembly  of  pre-built
                   components  into  flows,  nodes,  and  templates  simplify  software  development.    Consider  the
                   current traditional model, where teams of developers, even in remote locations, have to manage
                   complex  sprints  to  enable  integrations  between  frontend  and  backend  applications,  legacy
                   systems, and data silos.  Many low-code platforms claim a 10x faster app development.  At Iterate,
                   we have measured up to 17x with our platform.
               •  Cost-effectiveness:  Code reusability, shorter development cycles, and simplifying workloads all
                   cumulatively reduce software development costs.  Furthermore, over the long run, these savings
                   make a significant impact to your budgets in building, upgrading, and integrating new applications.
               •  Talent and Resource Management:  If we consider a macro picture, there are roughly 25 million
                   software developers in the world.  In contrast, the global talent for AI engineers is at 300,000 (in
                   2017) according to Tencent.  An organization with limited resources would be hard challenged to
                   compete for AI talent, yet at the same time, it would be foolhardy to ignore the importance of AI
                   application development, given that enterprise AI technology is growing at over a 20% CAGR.
                   Low-code brings accessibility to AI development.  Using the same methods of componentizing
                   blocks of codes, pre-built AI/ML models can quickly be customized and deployed for commercial
                   applications.  Iterate’s platform, Interplay, has 43 of them.  From a micro point of view, low-code
                   upskills your existing developer team.  For example, a web engineer can easily use a low-code platform,
                   with  existing  AI  components,  to  build  AI-powered  chatbots/voicebots,  product  recommenders,
                   knowledge graphs, computer vision applications, and much more.  With Interplay, it is possible to build
                   and deploy these applications at a production level, with the scalability and security requirements met.
                   Similarly,  non-developers  can  embrace  a  low-code  environment  to  drag  and  drop  blocks  and  make
                   enterprise applications, not necessarily just AI ones.  These can be frontend web forms, mobile apps,
                   HR/finance databases, etc.  Upskilling with low-code in effect maximizes the productivity of not only your
                   developer teams, but also your entire organization.

            The preceding arguments are explicit reasons to apply a top-down low-code strategy.  Additionally, there
            is an implicit but powerful advantage to strongly investing in low-code for your enterprise AI development.
            There is a “dirty secret” about relying on external vendors to develop AI applications provided by vendors,
            whether via SaaS or license models.  The intellectual property that comes from developing your use
            cases - the AI/ML models and algorithms - is not necessarily yours.  Oftentimes, your proprietary data
            that  is  needed  to  build  out  your  AI  use  cases  are  training  your  vendors’  models,  which  is  their  IP.
            Considering the effort required to gather, manage, and process data, not being able to own any of the
            final assets is a considerably missed opportunity.








            Cyber Defense eMagazine – December 2022 Edition                                                                                                                                                                                                         177
            Copyright © 2022, Cyber Defense Magazine. All rights reserved worldwide.
   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182